{"id":167,"date":"2024-10-02T19:03:16","date_gmt":"2024-10-02T17:03:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.garnier-malet.com\/dedoublement-espace-temps\/"},"modified":"2024-10-09T18:55:35","modified_gmt":"2024-10-09T16:55:35","slug":"doubling-theory","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.garnier-malet.com\/en\/doubling-theory\/","title":{"rendered":"The doubling Theory"},"content":{"rendered":"

[et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ _builder_version=”4.27.2″ _module_preset=”default” background_image=”https:\/\/new.garnier-malet.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/fond-dedoublement-du-temps.jpg” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.27.2″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.27.2″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.27.2″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”]<\/p>\n

The doubling Theory<\/a><\/h1>\n

[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][\/et_pb_section][et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ _builder_version=”4.27.2″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.27.2″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.27.2″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_accordion _builder_version=”4.27.2″ _module_preset=”default” hover_enabled=”0″ global_colors_info=”{}” sticky_enabled=”0″][et_pb_accordion_item title=”A DOUBLING\u2026 WHY ?” open=”off” _builder_version=”4.27.2″ _module_preset=”default” text_orientation=”justified” global_colors_info=”{}”]<\/p>\n

Characterized by a movement, a curious speed and a universal equation, the Doubling of Time and Space explains the infinitely small of the particles, the infinitely large of the Universe and\u2026 us, lost on a big land, planet of to a tiny solar system whose dimensions seem infinite to us.<\/span><\/p>\n

We only need to accept that imperceptible times may exist, stuck between two perceptible times.<\/span><\/p>\n

The time that elapses between a question (any obstacle) and the answer (overcoming the obstacle) defines an adaptation time for a particle that uses this time in its defined space, limited by its horizon. Time flow acceleration in an imperceptible horizon, doubled from the first horizon, allows a particle that was doubled from the initial particle, moving in the same way, to obtain the answer before the initial particle.<\/span><\/p>\n

Time acceleration can be such that the initial particle \u201cdoes not have the time” to use an “instant” of its time whereas the doubled particle “has all the time it needs” to obtain the answer to its question “in this same instant”. This requires the possibility to accelerate time while doubling the initial particle in imperceptible times, which I call “time openings”.<\/span><\/p>\n

However, time is observable and measurable by the movement of one space in relation to another one. Consequently it is continuous. Differentiating time in “time openings” is the same as differentiating the observation of a movement, and therefore differentiating the observer’s own perception, which is both the particle horizon and the particle in its horizon.<\/span><\/p>\n

Doubling implies that the observer is doubled, and exists in the initial observer’s time openings. Because of a perceptual difference, the doubled observer moves rapidly through accelerated time that to him appears normal. <\/span><\/p>\n

He ignores the initial observer since he ignores the time in which the other exists, which seems frozen to him.<\/span><\/p>\n

He can consider himself as an initial observer who is doubled in his turn. A third observer thus answers the second observer’s questions, and in his turn asks other questions.<\/span><\/p>\n

Information exchanges through imperceptible \u201ctime openings\u201d allow the first observer to get answers to questions he didn’t have time to ask. He gets to know the answers of the third observer before the second one that he can guide in suggesting him new questions which alter his memory instantaneously.<\/span><\/p>\n

The second observer exists in his own present. He answers the questions of the first observer, which to him appears to come from the past. He asks himself questions which the third observer answers. These answers appear to him to come from his future. Through instantaneous information exchanges in the time openings, he is thus an observer in three different timescales: past, present, future.<\/span><\/p>\n

The doubling theory provides an equation that allows us to express in rigorous terms the change of perception between two doubled observers existing in two different timescales.<\/span><\/p>\n

This equation is the very foundation of the Doubling Theory.<\/strong> By means of spatial and temporal changes in scale, it brings together the infinitely large universe of the initial observer and the infinitesimally small universe of the doubled observer.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

[\/et_pb_accordion_item][et_pb_accordion_item title=”THE DOUBLING MOVEMENT” _builder_version=”4.27.2″ _module_preset=”default” text_orientation=”justified” hover_enabled=”0″ global_colors_info=”{}” open=”off” sticky_enabled=”0″]<\/p>\n

Everything starts from a circle \u03a9<\/strong>, which turns on itself. His radius turns with a constant rotation speed \u03c6<\/strong>:<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/span><\/p>\n

However, this radius is the diameter of a circle \u03a9\/2<\/strong> two times smaller, which turns on itself two times faster, while turning in space, around his diameter with the same speed \u03c6<\/strong>. This circle \u03a9<\/strong> is like a carousel. By taking its place in it, the circle \u03a9\/2<\/strong> follows the movement, while turning on itself and spinning like a top.<\/span>
This fundamental movement goes on with the circle \u03a9\/4 = 2\u03b1<\/strong> two times smaller than the circle \u03a9\/2<\/strong>, two times smaller itself than the circle \u03a9<\/strong>\u2026<\/span><\/p>\n

It goes on and on in the infinitely small:<\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/span><\/p>\n

As in the infinitely large:<\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

The visualization of the movement with a computer shows us the particle\u2019s paths on the different circles nested in the same movement:<\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/span><\/p>\n

Aside from the tangential path which goes around, all the other paths go through the center point. Hence the logical names: \u201cradial\u201d and \u201ctangential\u201d paths. <\/span>
The movement equation is:<\/span><\/p>\n

X = cos\u00b2\u03c6(cos\u03c6 – sin\u00b2\u03c6)\u00a0\u00a0 Y = cos\u00b2\u03c6sin\u03c6(1 + cos\u03c6)\u00a0\u00a0 Z = – cos\u03c6sin\u00b2\u03c6<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

The radial curves are definitely complicated, but actually, only the beginning and the end of the doubling of the particle \u03b1<\/strong> in its horizon matter. We can represent in a very schematic way this Doubling movement on the axis of the horizon\u00a0\u03a9:<\/ohm><\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

One may say that this Doubling movement is universal in the infinitely small as in the infinitely large if the particle \u03b1<\/strong> is the horizon of its particle \u03b1\/8<\/strong> and if its horizon \u03a9<\/strong> is the particle of its own horizon 8\u03a9<\/strong>.<\/span><\/p>\n

This Doubling law could also be called\u00a0\u00ab\u00a0The law of the alpha and the omega\u00a0\u00bb, a law that governs the stars, the planets, the stunning Big-bang \u2013 as misunderstood as the general inflation\u2013\u00a0 the current apparent acceleration of the Universe expansion\u2026 and its upcoming contraction!<\/span>
A law which clearly needs a supreme intelligence, an intelligence which is able to put this law into effect and which would be both the alpha and the omega, and both the beginning and the end!<\/span>
In the infinitely small, the energy isn\u2019t continuous. She\u2019s distributed in a discontinued way\u00a0by “quanta” of energy: each “quantum” being separated from the next one by an imperceptible time, a practically null time, but where the particles have an infinite energy. This is the famous “Heisenberg\u2019s Principle”. In order to simplify, let\u2019s just say that: for a particle, the energy available multiplied by the practically null perceptible time of this availability, is superior or equal to the constant of Planck. As a result, if this time seems to be null for an observer, this energy appears to him to be infinite. Actually, the null time doesn\u2019t exist\u2026 This succession of quanta of energy gives the impression of a continuity for the observers that we are. It\u2019s nothing like that! That is why we call the mechanics “quantum” for the infinitely small of the particles. <\/span>
Doubling justifies itself easily by the following idea: a particle doubles itself to get into a universe to improve its knowledge, while skirting it in order to keep its memory intact. But it isn\u2019t just that! We saw that the doubled particle does the same thing with a universe two times smaller and on and on\u2026<\/span><\/p>\n

It is in this way that a tangential path is also a radial path leading to the center point of a universe two times bigger. As well as the radial path which is a tangential path of a universe two times smaller.<\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/span><\/p>\n

We can always say that: doubled from a tangential particle, a “radial particle”, is a “tangential particle” which doubles itself to explore without any danger a universe two times smaller.<\/span>
However, it would be interesting to know why, when and how this Doubling is limited in time and space. <\/span>
In the initial horizon, we saw that the radial path of a tangential path always equals to \u03c0R<\/strong>, if 2R is the diameter of the initial tangential path and \u03c0 = 3,14\u2026\u00a0 Considered as irrational, this no end number exists in a point of a diameter practically null. It also exists with a straight line that is a circle with an infinitely large radius or a distant tangential horizon. <\/span>
More simply, we can say that a radial path is the diameter of a horizon. He\u2019s composed of a succession of n tiny circles. The diameter of \u03a9<\/strong> equals to 2R<\/strong> for an external observer who considers this circle as the horizon of a small particle; it must equals to \u03c0R<\/strong> for an internal observer who considers this same circle as the distant horizon of its huge universe.<\/span><\/p>\n

In fact, through a horizon \u03a9<\/strong>, a radial path is schematically constituted of a succession of\u00a0n tiny circles \u03b1<\/strong> (radial paths), with a radius R\/n<\/strong>, where n is a whole number. Whatever n is, it equals to n\u03c0R\/n = \u03c0R<\/strong>:<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/span><\/p>\n

[\/et_pb_accordion_item][et_pb_accordion_item title=”THE DOUBLING EQUATION” _builder_version=”4.27.2″ _module_preset=”default” text_orientation=”justified” hover_enabled=”0″ global_colors_info=”{}” open=”on” sticky_enabled=”0″]<\/p>\n

Accelerating the Doubling movement and dilating a space in order to make him imperceptible in the initial space is interesting only if the observer of the initial space also doubles himself in the imperceptible space. Then, while staying the observer of the initial space, his \u201cdouble\u201d can observe the doubled space in a time that \u201chasn\u2019t the time\u201d to exist in the initial space. It is therefore essential to know the relation which allows to change the observation between two doubled spaces, evolving in two different timescales but in the same observation plan.<\/span><\/p>\n

The Doubling theory is based on a universal equation allowing the change from the internal observer (traveling through a radial path equaling to \u03c0R<\/strong> in a dilated and accelerated space) to the external observer (for whom this same radial path is the diameter of this same space: a diameter equaling to 2R):<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\"\"\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

The internal observer ignores the diameter 2R<\/strong> of its dilated horizon \u03a9\u2019<\/strong> who became equal to the initial horizon \u03a9<\/strong> in the initial plan, but in an imperceptible time of the initial observer.<\/span><\/p>\n

For the internal observer, this diameter D<\/strong> is the radial path \u03c0R<\/strong> of a particle who turns on itself: <\/span><\/p>\n

D = \u03c0R.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Corresponding to this diameter D<\/strong>, the apparent horizon appears to him as the half circumference which, as any other half circumstance equals to \u00bd \u03c0D<\/strong>.<\/span><\/p>\n

So for this internal observer, we have the relation:<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00bd\u03c0D = \u00bd \u03c0(\u03c0R) = \u03c0\u00b2R\/2.
<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

However, the rotation \u03c0<\/strong> viewed by the internal observer corresponds, for the external observer, to the apparent diameter 2R<\/strong> of the horizon \u03a9<\/strong>.<\/span><\/p>\n

Then (\u03c0\u00b2)\u207b<\/strong> for the internal observer (-)<\/strong>, <\/span><\/p>\n

Becomes (4R\u00b2)\u207a<\/strong> for the external observer (+)<\/strong>.<\/span><\/p>\n

But the radius R<\/strong>, seen by the external observer, equals to the radial path \u03c0\/8 because of the dilatation of the particle which becomes 8 times bigger during a 9th\u00a0rotation \u03c0\/8<\/strong>. <\/span><\/p>\n

Then (R\/2)\u207a<\/strong> for the external observer (+)<\/strong>,<\/span><\/p>\n

Becomes (\u03c0\/16)\u207b<\/strong> for the internal observer (-)<\/strong>.<\/span><\/p>\n

So: [(\u03c0\u00b2)(R\/2)]\u207a becomes [(4R\u00b2)( \u03c0\/16)]\u207b = (\u03c0R\u00b2\/4)\u207b.<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

However the external observer (+)<\/strong> perceives the \u00bd<\/strong> circumference \u03c0R<\/strong>, we can deduce that (\u03c0R\u00b2\/4)\u207b<\/strong> from the internal observer (-)<\/strong> equals to (\u03c0R)\u207a<\/strong> from the external observer (+)<\/strong>.<\/span><\/p>\n

Hence the fundamental equation of the change of perception of the time and of the space between the internal observer (-)<\/strong> and the external observer (+)<\/strong>: <\/span><\/p>\n

(\u03c0R\u00b2)\u207b = (4\u03c0R)\u207a<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

By considering the variable R<\/strong> and by deriving the first member of the equation \u03c0R\u00b2<\/strong>, we only get the half of the second member: (4\u03c0R)\/2<\/strong>. <\/span><\/p>\n

Where did the other half go? We mustn\u2019t forget that the rotation movement accelerates, \u03c0<\/strong> becoming 2\u03c0<\/strong> in an imperceptible time and in a space two times bigger where the result becomes right and observable in the time of the observer.<\/span><\/p>\n

The mathematical language allows another way of saying it:<\/span><\/p>\n

By considering the variable R<\/strong> and by deriving the first member of the equation \u03c0R\u00b2<\/strong> we get the half of the second member 2\u03c0R<\/strong>. Inversely, by integrating 2\u03c0R<\/strong>, we find again \u03c0R\u00b2<\/strong>. But this radius R<\/strong> is a constant! And the derivation of a constant gives zero and the integration of zero \u2013 apparently opposite operation \u2013 doesn\u2019t exist\u2026 except if zero doesn\u2019t exist!<\/span><\/p>\n

In this doubling of time, the integration always concerns an infinitely small number. The derivation of a constant should give another infinitely small constant as well as imperceptible in our time. That is obviously still not admitted in mathematics where zero stays an absolute zero. But what remains clear in the universe, because of the doubling of time, is that the absolute zero can\u2019t exist, otherwise the observation would be no more possible, and from this fact, the observer would become useless.<\/span><\/p>\n

All the mathematicians during Antiquity knew that zero didn\u2019t exist. Wouldn\u2019t it be the consequence of the knowledge of the Doubling movement?<\/span><\/p>\n

[\/et_pb_accordion_item][et_pb_accordion_item title=”THE SPEED OF LIGHT” _builder_version=”4.27.2″ _module_preset=”default” text_orientation=”justified” global_colors_info=”{}” open=”off”]<\/p>\n

By a verification of the Doubling movement in our solar system and a rigorous justification of the planetary movements, by a compliance with the fundamental Doubling movement defined in the theory, the speed of Light has been justified and above all calculated for the first tim<\/strong>e (1998 publications)<\/strong>.<\/span><\/p>\n

C\u2080 = trajet radial \/ trajet tangentiel = 2(108\u03c0Ds)10\u2074 \/ 1 an = 299 792 km\/s<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

With the sun diameter: Ds = 1 394 180 km.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

The speed of light is the universal constant of the Doubling movement. Hence, the apparent diameter of the Sun must absolutely match this value for the observers that we are in our solar system: as is currently the case. As we shall see, a modification of this diameter will naturally entail a modification of the radial path of the Earth (the distance aphelion-perihelion) without altering the tangential path (1\/2 year) which gives us the measurement of our time. This modification can lead to chaotic consequences for the Earth and the entire solar system.<\/span><\/p>\n

We finally understand the fundamental importance of this Time Doubling theory which puts the sun diameter at the first rank of the Earth observation.   <\/span><\/p>\n

Superluminal speeds,<\/strong> are necessary to the Doubling of Time. They are imposed by the Doubling movement, which allow their calculation<\/strong> (published in 1998):   <\/span><\/p>\n

C\u2082 = 7C\u2081= (7\u00b3\/12)10\u2075C\u2080, <\/strong>where C\u2080<\/strong> is the speed of Light.<\/span><\/p>\n

This speed relation limits the time and the space of the Doubling<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

At the end of the cycle appears a 3rd superluminal speed C\u2083 = 7C\u2082<\/strong> which opens our world on the “imperceptible”. We\u2019ll see that this limit imposes a finite number of second observers doubled from the first one. She also imposes only one doubling of the second observer who will only have one double to answer his questions.
By establishing the equation of the speed of Light, I have been able to explain rigorously the curious postulate introduced by Einstein who affirmed without any logical explanation that the speed of Light was independent from the source\u2019s speed and from the observer\u2019s speed. <\/span><\/p>\n

C\u2080 is the speed of perception of the time existing in a horizon of observation where all the different observers of this same horizon must perceive all the information at the same time to be a part of the same present reality. This synchronism of observation is indispensable so that he can exist in a present common to the different observers existing in the same horizon and the same time.<\/span><\/p>\n

The postulates disappear<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

To accelerate the time, speeds faster than C\u2080<\/strong> must be used. Called superluminal ones, thoses speeds give other doubled observers the possibiliy to perceive the reality faster. Since a few years, Scientifics (A. Aspect 1982, N. Gisin 1998, A. Suarez 2002) observed those speeds without being able to justify their existence. This justification seemed impossible because, according to Einstein’s equation (E=mC\u00b2)<\/strong>, a particle should have a null mass to reach the speed of Light. As an information is an energy E, she therefore owns a mass m = E\/ C\u00b2<\/strong> which, because of this equation, cannot go faster than the speed of Light.<\/span><\/p>\n

We can explain this on another way with the Doubling theory:<\/span><\/p>\n